4 ms·
Without Mistral, how would you get it to generalize to cards it hasn't seen before? I assume by "training a NN to draft without Mistral" you mean where the inpu
by apetresc 3y ago
Without Mistral, how would you get it to generalize to cards it hasn't seen before? I assume by "training a NN to draft without Mistral" you mean where the input layer is just a bitmapped vector of the cards in the pack, right? The killer feature of this experiment is that it works on sets the model has never seen before and has 0 training data on, using just the text of the card. I don't think you can do that without an LLM.
- greysphere 3y agoThat's a good point. It looks like the article hints at some success on that front. It'd be interesting to see what that means quantitatively. Interesting that this delta could even be used as a measure of the llm's value. I'd be curious about the difference in success w/ drafts on a new 2/2 bear with a different name, and cards with a new keyword 'fizzbangitude 7' as well.