3 ms·
Ha. You'd like to think so, but it's going to be awfully hard to coordinate resistance when the mass spying sweeps everyone up in a keyword-matching dragnet bef
by jstarfish 3y ago
Ha. You'd like to think so, but it's going to be awfully hard to coordinate resistance when the mass spying sweeps everyone up in a keyword-matching dragnet before the execution phase. This is the problem with every outgroup being labelled "terrorists."
Sabotage will be the name of the game at that point. Find ways to quietly confuse, poison, overwhelm and undermine the system without attracting the attention of the monitoring apparatus.
- paganel 3y agoI get your point, I think along those lines quite often myself. As per the sabotage part, bad input data that does not accurately get labeled as such until way too late in the “AI learning cycle” is I think the way to go. Lots and lots of such bad input data. How we would get to that point, that I don’t know yet, but it’s a valid option going forward.
- jstarfish 3y ago> How we would get to that point, that I don’t know yet, but it’s a valid option going forward. Chaos engineering. As a modern example, all this gender identity stuff wreaks absolute havoc on credit bureau databases. Tomorrow, we'll have people running around in fursuits to avoid facial recognition. After that, who knows.