5 ms·
Don't know, the pro LGBT stance of Mozilla/ Mozilla Foundation was not new in 2014 I believe. So not having leadership with opposing view does not seem strange
by Timshel 3y ago
Don't know, the pro LGBT stance of Mozilla/ Mozilla Foundation was not new in 2014 I believe.
So not having leadership with opposing view does not seem strange to me; donation was done privately but it end-up being public enough. There's enough hypocrisy and pink-washing ...
- taylodl 3y agoIs the Mozilla Foundation a software organization or a LGBTQ+ advocacy organization? If it's the former then what business do they have caring about Brandon Eich's personal donation to support a ballot initiative? If it's the latter then it's a conflict of interest and Brandon Eich should be asked to leave.
- Timshel 3y agoAt the moment they appear to want to be both. Might at times be at the detriment of Firefox but it's not like there is any alternative imo. So I don´t mind, it's not like if they remove their LGBT manifesto they suddenly will become relevant again and people will start to care about privacy. Might be that LGBT people care more about privacy and that this manifesto will help them stay relevant. And it's not like 2% is not a lot of people, TOR browser is certainly even less and it does not change the fact that I believe it's an highly important piece of software.