3 ms·
I don't see a slant other than quoting government officials on the impact of the tax laws they drafted, and their opinion on the impact of overturning those law
by jvanderbot 3y ago
I don't see a slant other than quoting government officials on the impact of the tax laws they drafted, and their opinion on the impact of overturning those laws.
Aside from interviewing the judges potentially involved (which happens almost never?) what could they have done?
- kyrra 3y agoQuote people that are constitutional lawyer that points out issues with the law. Passing a law that violates the constitution seems like an avenue that should be followed. Also, every article has a bias to it. If the author on NPR led with how the tax was potentially illegal and frame it that the couple is being unjustly taxed, that would have a very different feel than this article. The NPR author could then bury quotes from the author of the law further down in the article. Order of delivery of facts and the title of the article clearly show the authors bias in a certain direction. Here is an argument in favor of th couple. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-supreme-court-will-finally-decide-what-income-means-tax-investment-mandatory-repatriation-e647a03f https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-supreme-court-will-finally-...