I indeed read the paper. No snark needed. I disagree with your interpretation of the stable plural patchwork that you’ve represented here as supporting your cl

I indeed read the paper. No snark needed. I disagree with your interpretation of the stable plural patchwork that you’ve represented here as supporting your claim. However, the nuance in difference of our opinion isn’t that important in the grand scheme. For your last two paragraphs, I think you are actually describing social sorting - which the paper asserts as the underlining mechanism for which polarization happens online. The filter bubble is colloquially known as not seeing differing opinions online, yet as the paper states is untrue. Online we counter more diverse opinions. That’s what I wanted to point out. Best of luck to you.