> they sure did Not 20 years ago. Bard is equal with GPT series in my perspective. Equally unethical. I use neither. > see quick answers They are copied verb

> they sure did Not 20 years ago. Bard is equal with GPT series in my perspective. Equally unethical. I use neither. > see quick answers They are copied verbatim from the source material, and only from a single source. > gpl-violations notwithstanding Google is not a saint. GPL violations are egregious, too, But except Bard, Google (the search engine) doesn't provide you source code stripped from its license. > if something is on the internet, it's in the public domain. whether you like it or not, it will be copied, altered, remixed, shared. that's why the internet is so great Tell this to publishers, RIAA, Hollywood and oh, Disney. I'm sure they will agree with you wholeheartedly. Also authors of Source-Available and xGPL licensed software will gleefully join you. > anyways, the original point was the indiscriminate scraping, which again, is common practice. Something being common practice doesn't make it legal. Jaywalking, downloading ripped music and movies from torrent trackers and cracking licensed software products come into my mind.