4 ms·
How come Ruby frameworks don't utilize HTTP/2, Falcon seems like the only alternative but I don't know how mature it is?
by Alifatisk 3y ago
How come Ruby frameworks don't utilize HTTP/2, Falcon seems like the only alternative but I don't know how mature it is?
- Lio 3y agoI think it's in the works for Puma. Tenderlove posted this gist a while ago as proof of concept: https://gist.github.com/tenderlove/d68d9a3c4f7941192c9b https://gist.github.com/tenderlove/d68d9a3c4f7941192c9b
- byroot 3y agoBecause unless you want to expose your Ruby server directly to the internet without a load balancer, there isn't much to gain in having HTTP/2 between the LB and the app server. I'm curious though, what's your use case to and HTTP2 up to the app server?
- Alifatisk 3y agoTo be honest, I have no use case. I asked out of curiosity.
- quechimba 3y agoMayu uses HTTP/2. It's still experimental though. https://github.com/mayu-live/framework https://github.com/mayu-live/framework