3 ms·
The three outcomes are: * Successful cover up (0% damage). * Failed cover up (100% damage). * Don't bother (100% damage). So if doing nothing and failing to
by Dalewyn 3y ago
The three outcomes are:
* Successful cover up (0% damage).
* Failed cover up (100% damage).
* Don't bother (100% damage).
So if doing nothing and failing to cover up lead to the same result, you might as well give a shot at successfully covering up. Whatcha got to lose?
It is assumed not bothering is 100% damage because the screw up is apparently bad enough to warrant attempting a cover up.
- blowski 3y agoIn the UK it’s a crime to “flee the scene of an accident”, even if that accident was a minor scratch on a stationery vehicle.
- generic92034 3y agoIt is the same in many other European countries. But I guess in case of minor scratches those laws belong to the most frequently broken ones... ;)
- petsfed 3y agoExcept that in a lot of cases, a failed coverup incurs a few more felonies, so "don't bother" is closer to like 75%, while "failed cover up" is definitely 100%. In terms of risk analysis, rationally considering a coverup is in the same ballpark as rationally considering shorting a stock, in the sense that making the wrong call can cost a whole bunch more.
- SAI_Peregrinus 3y agoI'd say failed cover up is 100% damage, but "don't bother" is under 100%. A failed cover up is always worse than the initial screw up. E.g. this exact case, which went from civil penalties (loss of pilot's license) to criminal (jail time) AND civil penalties due to the failed cover up.