> There is a fully saturated air of superiority in the arguments that you are making and defending. I asked you not to do this, but you're continuing to do so

> There is a fully saturated air of superiority in the arguments that you are making and defending. I asked you not to do this, but you're continuing to do so and trying to justify it. I won't engage in this way. Any sense of superiority/inferiority or thought prescriptivism that you're sensing in what I'm saying is something you've projected onto me. I'm talking only about accessibility. This exchange has been bizarre.