4 ms·
> Own plane, own land and a filed flight path should satisfy the FAA's requirements, though you may also need to take active measures to ensure your private lan
by throw0101b 3y ago
> Own plane, own land and a filed flight path should satisfy the FAA's requirements, though you may also need to take active measures to ensure your private land is clear of things that could be harmed.
If he had a private air field/airport and "landed" (crashed) the plane on his air field, then that could be argued, but there's still the fact that he bailed out of the airplane and left it in an uncontrolled state, in which case there's probably some kind of 'reckless' charge that could be thrown at him.
- masklinn 3y agoOtoh people crash stuff on the reg (crash tests, stunts, …) and an unoccupied plane should be quite predictable. If you can demonstrate that you secured the area and it is large enough there is low-to-no chances of the plane getting out from bailout conditions everyone woukd likely be satisfied.
- krisoft 3y ago> you can demonstrate that you secured the area and it is large enough there is low-to-no chances of the plane getting out from bailout conditions You are probably underestimating how wast that area must be to do that.
- masklinn 3y agopray tell how can I be under-estimating when I am not estimating anything in the first place.