3 ms·
> There isn't a law that prevents you from intentionally crashing other vehicles. Just around property damage and endangering other people. Those two sentences
by bmitc 3y ago
> There isn't a law that prevents you from intentionally crashing other vehicles. Just around property damage and endangering other people.
Those two sentences don't make any sense next to each other. There's no way to intentionally crash your vehicle that doesn't include several other things for which their are specific laws for. One can't intentionally crash a car in the same way that you can intentionally swing a bat in your backyard without hitting anything.
Edit: Also, for what it's worth, it wasn't even his plane.
- ImPostingOnHN 3y ago> One can't intentionally crash a car in the same way that you can intentionally swing a bat in your backyard without hitting anything What exactly do you mean here? I've witnessed plenty of vehicle damage done on private ranchland from various obstacles, and in some cases, other family/friends' vehicles. If you wanted to drive your vehicle into a big rock on your own land, what exactly stops you?
- bmitc 3y agoSuch a scenario isn't really relevant here, is it? And you can't fly an airplane on your land because you don't own the air. He crashed a plane that wasn't his on land that wasn't his.
- ImPostingOnHN 3y agoI'm not the one who contrived the scenario, I'm just asking what you meant when you contrived it, because your assertion, on its face, seems to be contrary to reality. In general, you can indeed crash your car into your stuff on your land all you want. Did you mean to say that one can't intentionally smash a bat or a car into /other/ people's stuff without breaking a law? Because that seems pretty obvious.