>I only asked why no one can be an expert. Other than the fact that "disinformation expert" is a fake expertise invented to facilitate fallacious appeal to aut

>I only asked why no one can be an expert. Other than the fact that "disinformation expert" is a fake expertise invented to facilitate fallacious appeal to authority in the void left by a distrusted press: There are two answers to your question. First, everyone attempts to derive the truth from imperfect information and therefore is a "disinformation expert". There's no consistently guaranteed information access that makes any one person consistently an expert above most others, including Joe at his coffee table. That type of access and divulsion used to be assumed of the MSM. They destroyed their trust, and so now "disinformation experts" demand that trust. Broadley speaking, they won't get it. And they shouldn't. The second reason is that comprehensive presentation of any truthful information requires a presentation of all facts regarding it. Aside from the most mundane fact checking tasks, I've broadley observed "fact checkers" disseminating disinformation as much as the MSM does. Whether the method is lying by ommission or another.