4 ms·

I don't think many cinematographers would agree with you. We have the technology to make films at higher framerates, yet few choose to do so. Interestingly, Da

I don't think many cinematographers would agree with you. We have the technology to make films at higher framerates, yet few choose to do so. Interestingly, David Lynch shot Inland Empire at 60fps interlaced, but the film was released at 24fps.

anthonypasq 3y ago
anything with cgi will be much more expensive at higher frames right? I also have absolutely no idea how any of that works.
- squidsoup 3y ago
  I would think so, double the render time for 48fps, which is how Cameron shot Avatar II.
  - account42 3y ago
    Is the final render time really the major cost factor for CGI?