4 ms·
> It would seem they didn't necessarily have a problem with the research, but rather with the lead researcher This is the entire crux of the issue; do they hav
by cortesoft 3y ago
> It would seem they didn't necessarily have a problem with the research, but rather with the lead researcher
This is the entire crux of the issue; do they have a problem with the lead researcher because she isn't good at her job or because she is finding things that their large donor doesn't like?
- cbsmith 3y agoExactly. It's easy to presume one interpretation, but it's far from clear.
- ImPostingOnHN 3y agoExactly. The evidence* points to the act being corrupt, but the university is free to attempt to convince people otherwise. * - The researcher being removed without any good cause evident