3 ms·
Cool, I am building to code but I never could have built to code if it were required, because I have a day job and no time for inspections. So I built without
by beaeglebeach 3y ago
Cool, I am building to code but I never could have built to code if it were required, because I have a day job and no time for inspections. So I built without code inspections.
My experience is I know far more of the code than average volunteer firefighter who has probably never even looked at them, although perhaps not you.
- techsupporter 3y ago> So I built without code inspections. Building code and its associated inspections aren't, primarily, for you. They're for the people around you and the people who come after you. You might be the greatest builder on the planet. I, as the tenant or owner who lives in the structure after you, have no way of knowing that absent you following the process that says a separate entity confirmed that you built a safe structure. I, as your neighbor two parcels down, have no way of knowing that you did or didn't build a building that is likely to burn down and take half of the area with it. To head off what I'm sure is the inevitable reply along the lines of "I will live in this house until I die" and/or "there is no one around me for the next 100 miles", that's fine, but those are situations that can change. Code, and having the inspection, confirms that you did what society asked of you to keep the rest of us safe. (Is the building code and its associated inspections fallible? Absolutely. But deliberately flaunting them because you just didn't have time is similarly not an excuse.)
- beaeglebeach 3y agoMy community voted we would rather risk we all die in a fire than be homeless. My county is poor and people do their own work. I live here specifically to get away from people with your concerns.