>Who says that social media disinformation didn't exist four years ago? I've seen zero evidence that it did. Propaganda, sure. But 'disinformation'? No. >And

>Who says that social media disinformation didn't exist four years ago? I've seen zero evidence that it did. Propaganda, sure. But 'disinformation'? No. >And even if one were to grant that, how long should a field exist before there can be an expert? Probably more than three years. It feels like people latching onto the profit opportunity to shore up eastablishmen narratives under a fancy new buzzword more than a real objective science.