>Opening statement is going to need significant explanation to not sound like a like half of a strawman or slippery slope fallacy. Not even a complete one. Agr

>Opening statement is going to need significant explanation to not sound like a like half of a strawman or slippery slope fallacy. Not even a complete one. Agreed. To do that, you would replace Tax cuts with Marginal income tax rate cuts, replace only benefit the rich with are correlated in OECD nations with increased income disparities in 1- and 5-year windows, and debunking trickle-down economics with suggesting imprudence of income tax cuts. But it would be a pretty long title to do all that.