4 ms·
You mean to say that no one is running the world, not even behind the scenes, or even behind behind the scenes? You are leaving us without anyone to blame! Dari
by stareatgoats 3y ago
You mean to say that no one is running the world, not even behind the scenes, or even behind behind the scenes? You are leaving us without anyone to blame! Daring I must say.
- sroussey 3y agoCertainly not a way to get clicks. People are eager to see patterns—it’s in our wetware. For example: two podcasts about JFK: one is about a lone gunman, the other a secret conspiracy and coverup. Which will be more interesting? Get more of an audience?
- wizzwizz4 3y agoConsider “Oswald: the man who took on the United States Secret Service, and won”. I'm not particularly interested in US history, but I think I'd find this much more interesting than yet another conspiracy podcast.
- yieldcrv 3y agofunny, but another thing I think people miss is that there are opportunists for every outcome think your controversial head of state is being controlled by their buddies from university that run some private equity funds well so would the other head of state if they won the election! different buddies its more like if you dont also have a plan for outsized influence, then thats the biggest outlier and inefficient way of navigating the system we have