4 ms·
humans can't be trusted to not censure information they dislike. corporate or private people will all follow their own self interests. there is no version where
by globalnode 3y ago
humans can't be trusted to not censure information they dislike. corporate or private people will all follow their own self interests. there is no version where this ends well.
- dmix 3y agoHumans have dealt with serious society-wise cultural issues rooted in base emotional desires like these many, many times before, and evolved beyond them. We can still develop common sense and a culture that is highly cautious of these attempts to censor everything, the stuff motivated by an ever expand hyper sensitivity to anything in shades of grey of something they don't like. We've experience half a decade where being censor-happy has become the norm, rather than merely cleaning up communities of the fringe edge cases that are truly bad. As usual with humans a good idea leaned on taken to the extreme, a hammer seeking nails. Definitely not the first time humans attempted something like this. The constant negative outcomes of these impulsive behaviours usually build up ad nauseam, and almost always result in cultural backlash which eventually turns into a new common sense. Democracy was built of a similar reaction to negative base desire for isolated hyper centralized authority. I'm confident a similar shift will happen in reaction to the hyper-ideological "everyone I disagree with should be banned from commenting" safe space movement. At least as long as the force of government doesn't turn it from merely cultural to criminal or regulatory as it already starting to in some countries.
- globalnode 3y agoi hope so too!