3 ms·
They're doing it (I presume) in the middle of the day, and for a couple of hours maybe. They're not keeping the victims up for 48 hours straight playing the mus
by function_seven 3y ago
They're doing it (I presume) in the middle of the day, and for a couple of hours maybe. They're not keeping the victims up for 48 hours straight playing the music.
I think it's a fine idea for a fundraiser.
- MarcoZavala 3y ago[dead]
- dantheman 3y agoFundraisers should benefit both people, this is extortion.
- jncfhnb 3y agoCool. I’ll set up at your work desk to kick off another one.
- soerxpso 3y agoWhen you have an audience of people who are forbidden from leaving, you have some level of obligation to use their time wisely. The myth of "yeah you're forced to be here, but it's for your own good!" really breaks down when the "good" use of their time is intentionally annoying them to extort money. I hated things like this when I was in highschool. It made me think (often rightfully) that even from an academic perspective my time would have been better spent at home playing Counterstrike.
- function_seven 3y agoYeah, I was surprised how hated my comment was. I was thinking something like, "pfft, kids these days are too soft." Or something like that. When I was in middle school, we had an annual fundraiser for the American Heart Assoc. It was one of those "____-a-thon" style events where we all had to jump rope for as long as we could, and we gathered pledges from family members ("only 1¢ per jump, Aunt Sally!"). But this was only for an hour, and it replaced our normal PE period, so it wasn't a diversion from the normal course of schooling. And not everyone participated. That's the kind of thing I had in mind when writing that comment, but now I'm realizing the parent comment was talking about the entire student body, for the entire school day. I agree with you. My original take was hot... and bad. :)