4 ms·
People wonder why I like using the shell-based ACME client like dehydrated (or acme.sh): * https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=dehydrated https://packa
by throw0101b 3y ago
People wonder why I like using the shell-based ACME client like dehydrated (or acme.sh):
* https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=dehydrated https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=dehydrated
* https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh
Versus the official client certbot:
* https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=python3-certbot https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=python3-certbot
A kludgy as very long shell scripts are (thought to be), I probably have a better chance of being able to go through all the that code and understand it than a dozen(+) Python libraries. And if there's an update/s, a diff of one shell script easier to parse than multiple libraries that may be updated.