3 ms·
> and his sister is mentally unwell. Potentially as a result of or exacerbated by abuse, or tolerance thereof? Or made her an easier target? > it serves no pu
by FireBeyond 3y ago
> and his sister is mentally unwell.
Potentially as a result of or exacerbated by abuse, or tolerance thereof? Or made her an easier target?
> it serves no purpose to a a thread about OpenAI buying chips from a company he is invested in.
Certainly it does. Self-interest, conflict of interest etc., raises valid concerns about a person's sense of morality and ethics. Much like alleged assault or abuse of a vulnerable family member.
- infecto 3y agoWhat a weird world we live in. Abuse of any type is not condonable but at the same time proof of some type is necessary. Provide proof and there can be discussion around it. I am concerned you feel the need stretch so far to attack someone. Edit: Don't even bother replying, this person is a Elon/Altman hater. The majority of comments are just negative spam against any kind of thread related to OpenAI or Tesla.
- FireBeyond 3y ago> Abuse of any type is not condonable but at the same time proof of some type is necessary You're right, in a criminal court. I don't know what the evidence is or isn't. Neither do you. I just posited a theory. The very vast majority of abuse has no "proof" and often boils down to he said, she said. > Don't even bother replying, this person is a Elon/Altman hater. The majority of comments are just negative spam against any kind of thread related to OpenAI or Tesla. Let's see, 9,114 comments on HN, 100 or so which relate to Musk/Tesla, and approximately 20 of which reference the OpenAI drama. Revisit the site guidelines: * Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something. * Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.