4 ms·
>>conducted in public by parties appointed by accountable representatives are somehow repugnant, Well this where you find the problem, to me and many many oth
by phpisthebest 3y ago
>>conducted in public by parties appointed by accountable representatives are somehow repugnant,
Well this where you find the problem, to me and many many others choosing a medical / insurance providers from an array of medical / insurance providers seems to provide MUCH MUCH more accountability then "parties appointed by accountable representatives " who are not really accountable at all, and whom elections are based on any number of issues very rarely would be the status of medical dealth panels, for the US currently would the "hot button" topics of the day (and for the last several decades) immigration, abortion and gun control
This mythical idea that elections are how we hold the unelected bureaucracy in check has many many many examples of being completely and utterly false, unelected bureaucracy has ZERO fear of the election cycle most of the time. Meet the new boss, sames as the old boss, and almost none of them every leave.
Of all the industries government bureaucracy has some of the longest tenured employees next only to education where once a person joins an agency they never leave until death or retirement. The Rare Exception is the regulatory capture of ruling making boards and committee's where there is a revolving corrupt door between the public and private sectors.