5 ms·
Self-hosting email has been essentially dead for almost a decade. Even if you don't ever SPAM and send like one email a day on average, you won't be able to ge
by 77pt77 3y ago
Self-hosting email has been essentially dead for almost a decade.
Even if you don't ever SPAM and send like one email a day on average, you won't be able to get them delivered to the recipient's inbox.
You can use SPF, DKIM, DMARC all you want, google won't care.
- geek_at 3y agocan't confirm. I'm hosting a online registration software for parent-teacher conferences and hosting all my mailservers on my business internet line. If you have DKIM,DMARC,SPF and the reverse DNS of the mailserver is set to the correct domain you have no problem. Well.. except for GMX and yahoo which frequently block me for a few hours when multiple parents register at the same time
- rfmoz 3y agoThe security solutions on the mail system make a line that you need to cross, but it doesn’t guarantee a success. It’s a hard way to guess how good is the implementation on the receiver, like GMX, Libero or other big country providers with “historical” service that don’t care about them too much.
- 77pt77 3y agoGMX is banned in many places for example.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- slowbdotro 3y agoI agree. Self hosted my email for over a decade and as long as you do the recommended SPF, DKIM and DMARC you have basically no problems. Occasionally I turn up in spam when I email someone I haven't before, but that's usually due to the .ro in my domain and the forced text mode rather than html. I've found problems only start occuring when you send transactional email. User signups, notifications, etc. Anything really automated. I think people like to joke on self hosting email because there are a lot of moving parts and it was hard to diagnose why something went wrong. Until the last decade and early 2010s there were no all in one self hosted solutions that made it easy & available for most to do it.
- 77pt77 3y ago> Occasionally I turn up in spam when I email someone I haven't before Just proved my point.
- 8organicbits 3y agoLast week I saw the same behavior sending email from my work's Google Workspace account to my personal Gmail account. The email stays within Google, I'm logged into both accounts on the same computer, does Google think I am I spamming myself...?
- 77pt77 3y agoGoogle's expense reimbursement emails were systematically considered to be SPAM by gmail. Google knew this because they even issued warnings. Still, using your own domain and machine is different. Unless you've had an interaction with that email address it will be considered SPAM.
- petee 3y agoGoogle puts random things in Spam, including ones marked 'not spam' or from otherwise reputable senders (like Github, despite receiving their emails for a decade). My monthly credit card bills occasionally are dumped in spam. Its not really proof of much unless one is constantly getting junked
- ninjin 3y agoBack when I used GMail, Google would sometimes mark correspondence e-mails from Google staff as spam. Heck, I even had instances of responses to e-mails I had sent to Google staff marked as spam. Spam filtering is complex and clearly Google has (and continue) to tread a very fine line here.
- jamespo 3y agoWait until you get on MS blocklist with no recourse
- 77pt77 3y agoOr on any other RBL because someone else in the same netblock (maybe) did something suspicious.
- rfmoz 3y agoLooking for help with Postfix configuration usually put you in forums threads with almost +10 years.
- sillystuff 3y agopostfix-users is active, and primary devs very frequently answer user questions (you should make an effort to go through the documentation first). https://www.postfix.org/lists.html https://www.postfix.org/lists.html To get an idea without subscribing: https://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/ https://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/
- kiwijamo 3y agoAnd thankfully the solution is almost always the same even after many years.
- Avamander 3y agoChoosing Postfix at this point in time is a mistake anyways though. Things like Stalwart or Haraka are just so much nicer to use.
- dugite-code 3y agoWhy? it's widely deployed, actively maintained and more importantly reliable. 10+ year old support threads are mostly still valid advice.
- Avamander 3y agoIt needs a bunch of milters to have basic functionality, such as DKIM, SPF and DMARC. OpenDKIM and OpenDMARC are not well-maintained, reliable or nice to use.
- rfmoz 3y agoPostfix was designed years ago, but that doesn't do it bad, it is a beast, it can handle 5k mails per second (DKIM signed) with an small tunning in a modern hardware without problem.
- dspillett 3y agoStill running my own mail server, for myself and friends. No problems with deliverability thus far (including to Google) with SPF and DKIM set correctly. The killer problem is often source address, and source address range, reputation. Mail sent from a normal residential ISP will have trouble. Addresses allocated by many VPS providers (and some dedicated server providers) will have spotty reputation. Mail from cheap VPS providers simply won't get through (many block SMTP outgoing and state so on sign-up because they don't want the support burden of people complaining about this). Sending mail from cloud providers can be an issue too (I've had mixed results with VMs in Azure sending out alerts). If you are stuck with such a source reputation issue then you can use a service like MXRoute (several others are available, this one I've not used but it seems popular on a couple of hosting forums I frequent) as a relay. Obviously that is not free, but it is cheaper than moving to a much more expensive VPS provider or changing your home ISP. Another reputation issue many have when setting up a new project is that many mail servers explicitly distrust new domains. In this case SPF, DKIM, and a good reputation source address won't make much difference. The definition of “new” varies from place to place but where it is an issue you need a domain registered at least some months ago. This can be mitigated somewhat by users explicitly marking messages from new domains as not spam, but that is not something you can rely upon as said users need to see the message to be able to mark it that way.