3 ms·

If it was investigated, both the investigation and findings went completely unmentioned publicly. News coverage at the time made it clear that there weren't ac

If it was investigated, both the investigation and findings went completely unmentioned publicly. News coverage at the time made it clear that there weren't active investigations and Sweden effectively blocked any investigation due to national security concerns. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/sweden-shuns-formal-joint-investigation-nord-stream-leak-citing-national-2022-10-14/ https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/sweden-shuns-formal-joi...

fragmede 3y ago
The Wikipedia page links to a bunch of pieces to the global investigation that happened, including the letter to the United Nations Security Council that three detonations were an act of sabotage.
- _heimdall 3y ago
  Any chance you have a link you could share? I skimmed the Wikipedia pages for Nord 1 & 2 but don't have time to dig deeper at the moment I know I had seen claims that it was a Ukrainian special forces colonel (or captian?) that called the attack, but those claims I've seen all leaned on released intelligence documents and sources without any mention of an actual investigation of the attack site. Those claims sounded circumstantial to me as they were only based on intel reports before/after the attack and didn't get to my point that no investigation of the site occurred immediately after the pipes where hit.
  - lesuorac 3y ago
    It has its own wikipedia page [1]. Investigations take time but don't necessarily mean they've stalled. The last leaks were from Nov 11, 2023 so less than a month ago so it's hard to call that stall. Sure anybody can just point fingers like Russia did at the UK [2] but then you just look silly when you can't substantiate it. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Nord_Stream_pipeline_sabotage# https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Nord_Stream_pipeline_sabo... [2]: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-british-navy-personnel-blew-up-nord-stream-gas-pipelines-2022-10-29 https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-british-nav...

fragmede 3y ago

The Wikipedia page links to a bunch of pieces to the global investigation that happened, including the letter to the United Nations Security Council that three detonations were an act of sabotage.

_heimdall 3y ago
Any chance you have a link you could share? I skimmed the Wikipedia pages for Nord 1 & 2 but don't have time to dig deeper at the moment I know I had seen claims that it was a Ukrainian special forces colonel (or captian?) that called the attack, but those claims I've seen all leaned on released intelligence documents and sources without any mention of an actual investigation of the attack site. Those claims sounded circumstantial to me as they were only based on intel reports before/after the attack and didn't get to my point that no investigation of the site occurred immediately after the pipes where hit.
- lesuorac 3y ago
  It has its own wikipedia page [1]. Investigations take time but don't necessarily mean they've stalled. The last leaks were from Nov 11, 2023 so less than a month ago so it's hard to call that stall. Sure anybody can just point fingers like Russia did at the UK [2] but then you just look silly when you can't substantiate it. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Nord_Stream_pipeline_sabotage# https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Nord_Stream_pipeline_sabo... [2]: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-british-navy-personnel-blew-up-nord-stream-gas-pipelines-2022-10-29 https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-british-nav...