2 ms·
If someone could explain the dishonest part to a simpleton like me it would be sincerely appreciated. So he has an incentive to do business with a chip maker t
by lopatin 3y ago
If someone could explain the dishonest part to a simpleton like me it would be sincerely appreciated.
So he has an incentive to do business with a chip maker that he invested in. But that's allowed right? Or is the argument more that it's like insider trading (investing?) because he knew he might announce business with it in the future? Since it's not publicly traded, I don't even know if that's unethical.
- ric2b 3y agoHe is not the owner of OpenAI so it can be considered harmful to the company if there was a better chip maker or deal available but he chose the one he has a personal take in. It would be very hard to prove that choosing company A over company B was a knowingly worse choice for OpenAI though.