4 ms·
The before after on the luxury brands is baffeling. Serif the old looks much better
by Unfrozen0688 3y ago
The before after on the luxury brands is baffeling. Serif the old looks much better
- Cockbrand 3y agoAnd often much more premium, IMHO.
- crazygringo 3y agoFunny, I'm the opposite. The old logos look fuddy-duddy, like stuff that my grandmother would have loved. The new logos make me think -- oh, maybe they're actually doing something cool and relevant today, and not stuck in outdated ideas of luxury that include full sets of china and silver and mink coats.
- Unfrozen0688 3y agoI'm talking about these. You serious? https://imgur.com/NyhbDFC https://imgur.com/NyhbDFC We truly are lost.
- furyofantares 3y agoI had the same reaction as you, but the point makes a lot of sense to me after some consideration. If I cover up the new ones, I can TOTALLY see how someone could associate the old ones with values and styles they find outdated. At an extreme, if I imagine asking my 16yo niece about the old logos, I wouldn't be at all surprised by a highly negative association with the old.
- crazygringo 3y agoYes exactly. They look like they're for grandma and will go with her pearls. And a Rolls-Royce. I don't see what's so "lost" about that. It's certainly not the type of luxury vibe that seems to speak to anything desirable today. The logos look like something out of a museum.
- Unfrozen0688 3y agoToday the height of status is the new iphone and a gucci shirt. How far we have fallen.
- crazygringo 3y agoHow is that any different than a new Rolex and a Brooks Brothers shirt? The more things change, the more they stay the same. (And at least an iPhone does a lot more than a Rolex, and is a heckuva lot cheaper too. So I see this as a major improvement, actually.)
- Unfrozen0688 3y ago>How is that any different than a new Rolex and a Brooks Brothers shirt? Also nevau rich shit
- crazygringo 3y agoNouveau riche? OK, so we haven't fallen at all. That was my point.