3 ms·
> The problem comes in when you repeat the exercise on a different example and find that also 0/0 = 3, or whatever. And now you start to see something is really
by 4death4 3y ago
> The problem comes in when you repeat the exercise on a different example and find that also 0/0 = 3, or whatever. And now you start to see something is really amiss.
Yes, that's the obvious part.
- argiopetech 3y agoIn this case, but the induction step is still important...
- aeonik 3y agoThat really sounds like it would be the identity. If dividing by nothing is congruent with no operation, then the original set, unmodified should be returned.