3 ms·
Mediawiki is huge and very complex. Why not something more simple like instiki? Personally I would prefer a wiki with git backend. I wrote one [1] but I dont r
by entropie 3y ago
Mediawiki is huge and very complex. Why not something more simple like instiki?
Personally I would prefer a wiki with git backend. I wrote one [1] but I dont recommend using it.
https://github.com/entropie/oy https://github.com/entropie/oy
- teleforce 3y agoHow about docusaurus and tinasaurus? The latter is based on TinaCMS. [1] Docusaurus: https://docusaurus.io/ https://docusaurus.io/ [2] Tinasaurus: https://github.com/tinacms/tinasaurus https://github.com/tinacms/tinasaurus
- entropie 3y agoThis arent wikis..?
- teleforce 3y agoYes, while technically speaking they are not wiki in traditional sense, they are based on Git thus collaborative editing is feasible and combined with friendly interface of TinaCMS in which Tinasaurus is based on, it can be a modern Wiki version on steroid i.e lean and fast wiki
- giraffe_lady 3y agoFossil, the bespoke VCS used by sqlite includes a wiki & web server out of the box. It's not normally what people think of in this domain but I've used it for that purpose and it works great for it. https://fossil-scm.org https://fossil-scm.org
- entropie 3y agoThis is really cool. Thanks for pointing to it.