3 ms·
The article kind of answers its own question in 2 sentences: > But gigawatt scale reactors are easy to turn into bespoke engineering megaprojects. Custom engin
by gary_0 3y ago
The article kind of answers its own question in 2 sentences:
> But gigawatt scale reactors are easy to turn into bespoke engineering megaprojects. Custom engineering for every site foregoes economies of manufacturing scale.
My core impression of the SMR enthusiasm was that it would be really great if we had a few factories pumping out "nuclear energy pods" on an assembly-line, and then those modules could be plopped down anywhere and plugged into the grid. Energy problem solved.
The issues with the economic inefficiency of smaller reactors could be solved with a sprinkling of Technology Dust from the Innovation Fairy.
How about an equally starry-eyed idea: We build out the grid worldwide, and then just build one giant reactor complex per continent; we get nuclear economy of scale, but we don't ship the reactors to different locations, we ship their energy output instead. As for any problems with economic inefficiency (or the limits of HVDC transmission lines) I again invoke the Innovation Fairy.
- throwawayqqq11 3y agoWith small scale reactors in large numbers, you also drastically extend the surface area for problems like human errors or accidents, natural catastrophies or even manufactoring errors. I dont thing SMRs are a good idea. Not to mention the waste...
- gary_0 3y agoI can think of even more problems. Off the top of my head: the manufacture of SMR modules would be, by design, centralized into a few large, well-funded entities needing lots of government permits. The probability of corruption, mismanagement, or political bikeshedding would be pretty high. In the worst case, SMRs would just take the various problems large reactor projects have and gather them into one manufacturing choke-point.