4 ms·
That only partially diminishes the point. It has been in effect for the vast majority of the duration of the war and is obviously worth considering, instead of
by standardUser 3y ago
That only partially diminishes the point. It has been in effect for the vast majority of the duration of the war and is obviously worth considering, instead of downvoting into oblivion without even offering a response.
- ceejayoz 3y agoIf it was never used, how "in effect" was it really? I also can't see any support for the assertion that this would've meant US ownership of bits of Ukraine. WWII's Lend-Lease was a legal fiction; the lended (at no cost) weapons, vehicles, etc. were expected to wind up expended/destroyed, not returned.
- eropple 3y agoI was being tongue-in-cheek. The rest of your post wasn't worth engaging with, as 'ceejayoz aptly demonstrated.