> biologically speaking it doesn’t make any sense to be child-free. It makes total sense. Not all members of a species reproduces... it's actually common that

> biologically speaking it doesn’t make any sense to be child-free. It makes total sense. Not all members of a species reproduces... it's actually common that only a few do. Bees are the extreme case where basically only one female in a whole hive reproduces... with chimps we know that it's mostly the alpha male who does and most males do not get a chance. Most animals actually die very young, before even being mature enough for reproduction. Your hypothesized "everyone should have kids" world doesn't exist. In fact, biologically, you could say it's "better" if only the strongest multiply while all the others just "care" for their young. Don't confuse your morals and wishes with what biology actually entails.