So far AI was great in generating awe-inspiring outputs and fail on realism. I've been to Cappadocia and the photos of the photographer don't represent the real

So far AI was great in generating awe-inspiring outputs and fail on realism. I've been to Cappadocia and the photos of the photographer don't represent the reality of Cappadocia at all, they are all heavily stylised and what's lost is the awe to this stylisation. IMHO Artists really need to embrace these new tools the way they embraced digitalisation and thrived. You can tell that there's a plenty of room for artists as the nerdy types keep pumping out of the mill AI content that is only interesting in the context that it is AI. The swagged pope image for example, is an example of good use of the tech for art(I know, may will disagree but consider the impact of that image on the culture). My problem with the generative AI tools is strictly with the economical problems they might create to the artists who might lost the opportunity to be compensated for the art they already produced(because their business landscape was designed with the assumption that it's impossible to do what AI does today) and used in the development(training) of these tools. Other than that, it's just another toolset and it creates ample opportunities.