3 ms·
I don't think that revised statement is an equal parallel, as spin art and generative models are not dependent on each other. Although someone could, and probab
by itronitron 3y ago
I don't think that revised statement is an equal parallel, as spin art and generative models are not dependent on each other. Although someone could, and probably will, make a generative spin art model if they haven't already done so.
Basically, I think there is a risk that someone becomes overly enamored with the generative process, and just creates something that is solely an outcome of that generative process. A good example for this is the generative tree drawing algorithms. Great, a line drawing that resembles a tree, "look what we can make tech do!" That is math and algorithms, not art.
- therein 3y ago> I think there is a risk that someone becomes overly enamored with the generative process, and just creates something that is solely an outcome of that generative process. I agree with that entirely. That is already happening at a concerningly rapid pace with little in its way and will only speed up.