3 ms·
What you call "cautious conservatism" is actually playing fast and loose with the rules, and doing the wrong thing, if the prescribed burns are actually import
by qup 3y ago
What you call "cautious conservatism" is actually playing fast and loose with the rules, and doing the wrong thing, if the prescribed burns are actually important.
- 2devnull 3y agoNo. What I want is more unbiased scientific study of the topic before assuming we know for certain that climate change hasn’t altered the relationship between wildfire and forrest health. Funding more research is hardly “playing fast and loose” rather it is the opposite.