3 ms·
>I think it's the "public nature" of the thing. But how do we decide what is of a "public nature"? There is no "public nature." Simply allowing the public to u
by krapp 3y ago
>I think it's the "public nature" of the thing. But how do we decide what is of a "public nature"?
There is no "public nature." Simply allowing the public to use a service doesn't make it public. MacDonald's will let anyone walk in and order food, and it's ubiquitous, but that doesn't make it a public utility.
- paulmd 3y agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_accommodations_in_the_United_States https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_accommodations_in_the...
- krapp 3y agoNot in the sense that epgui it using it. They don't want Youtube to simply improve their accessibility and abide by nondiscrimination laws, they want it nationalized and regulated as a utility because of its popularity. Which I'm reasonably confident (despite not being a lawyer) is not a thing in the US. At least not yet.
- epgui 3y agoI can tell you that's not exactly what I want.