I'm sure this is true and the article presents relevant points about Wikipedia's drug coverage, but it probably largely comes down to what's in the second to la

I'm sure this is true and the article presents relevant points about Wikipedia's drug coverage, but it probably largely comes down to what's in the second to last paragraph: "But no internet source can replace the authority of a physician, doctors said." In other words, "no computer can do my job better than I can." Never heard that before and I can't imagine the motivation behind the statement. At some point (if not already) it seems likely that it will be generally safer to look up a drug and find out the effects on the Internet (maybe never on Wikipedia, but somewhere). No doctor's brain can contain a complete database of every drug and its effects and interactions with other drugs.