Right, that’s why I said: “This is the sort of thing that you would need to include in an Additional Protocol.” I think some people were confused why they were

Right, that’s why I said: “This is the sort of thing that you would need to include in an Additional Protocol.” I think some people were confused why they were calling it an emblem. It’s an analogy to the protective emblems agreed in the GCs and APIII. But analogy alone won’t make this binding, and the ICRC knows that. This “technical solution” isn’t like a solution that solves the problem today. It’s the first step in showing that doing the work of another AP is possible and needed.