4 ms·

If this is all legit, you’re best trying to get an in somehow with a16z. They’re throwing money left and right at people doing this kind of stuff.

• danielhanchen 3y ago
  Oh my A16z? Do you have any contacts? :)) But for now - our goal is somehow to get revenue ourselves via some cool AI products, and trying to shrink the expenses to 0 (like via our fast training methods)
  • angrais 3y ago
    One approach you could take is to license the code (or simply the tricks) to big tech companies. They can use the tricks, but must pay you x amount. You can provide technical support for implementation and benchmarking. That's how I would make profit from what you're doing as many big tech companies have already achieved (and more) of what you claim. I know this as I work in such a company. However, I'd bet they'd pay a fair amount for new solutions that differ from their own.
    • danielhanchen 3y ago
      Hmm the main issue sounds like the market capture is limited - I highly disagree bigtech companies have achieved what we already have - maybe OpenAI or other AI companies might have done it - but it's all "might" have. I worked myself in the past at NVIDIA making algos faster, so it's not a done deal big tech companies have all the tips and tricks. They have the best hardware, but software not so much. The issue with licensing code is your revenue capture is minimal - maybe a training platform which provides everyone and not just big tech companies a cheap and efficient implementation sounds much better. The issue with licensing is how much do you charge? How do you monitor usage? Etc