3 ms·
I don't think its red state vs blue state. I think its urban areas/cities vs suburbs/rural areas. And you can't really split this up by state. And this is more
by Racing0461 3y ago
I don't think its red state vs blue state. I think its urban areas/cities vs suburbs/rural areas. And you can't really split this up by state.
And this is more fundamental than income and skin color/identity politics since these are geniunely different lifestyles that can't be served by 1 political party. There seems to be some realignment happening. (modern day version of the book - the town mouse and the country mouse).
And by "serve" i mean each member with D/R next to their name will bend to the party as the avg. Look at Angus King from Maine. ik there was a mass shooting etc but in pro gun maine, independent senator king (but caucus with D) just proposed an "assault weapon ban" that CA/WA/NY/MA etc has. This is one example but it happens for other things to.
What does the future look like? Somewhere between perputual rule by a few cities with Singapore/Dubai/Hong Kong level power to a "national divorce"/balkanization/threats of succession or ignoring the federal government. I'm not too optimistic so im leaning towards the latter. The soviet union fell just 2 decades ago. This isn't too out of left field.
- vandyswa 3y agoOf course, do remember that the original USA legal structure was _explicitly_ designed to avoid "the tyranny of the majority". It was founded by a number of different religious sects, and the small ones didn't want to be dominated by the big ones. A rural person in flyover country would care a lot less about what the Coastals think, except that what they think is being increasingly pressed upon them on many, many fronts.