I really don't like the idea that refunds make theft acceptable (and don't tell me this is not theft, because it is) If someone broke into my house, stole some

I really don't like the idea that refunds make theft acceptable (and don't tell me this is not theft, because it is) If someone broke into my house, stole something worth $100 and left behind $100 in cash, that wouldn't make it not theft, so why should this be different? If I buy a product, I should have full control over it for the purposes of personal use, nobody should have the right to take it from me without my consent, that's stealing and a refund doesn't justify it. If a corporation can do this and get away with it, the law has failed.