6 ms·
Firefox's users shouldn't have to ignore or disable them. That kind of extraneous functionality just shouldn't be bundled with Firefox to begin with. If a use
by VancouverMan 3y ago
Firefox's users shouldn't have to ignore or disable them.
That kind of extraneous functionality just shouldn't be bundled with Firefox to begin with.
If a user does want such functionality, then an extension could be voluntarily installed to provide it.
- varelse 3y ago[dead]
- throwaway525142 3y agoI agree that this could be viewed as bad. However, this is way less of an issue than Google taking choice away, which is what the great-grandparent comment was about.
- Krssst 3y agoMaybe it's useless but it's not abusive as it does not behave in a way that the user does not want. The other browser tried to push for Web Integrity API and is now degrading adblock experience, I feel that there's really no comparison. Mozilla may have missteps but the browser still clearly seem to be siding with the user.
- clouddrover 3y agoVirtually all software comes with options I turn off and settings I change, from the operating system to the simplest utility. The defaults are almost always not what I want.
- PrimeMcFly 3y agoJust use Librewolf. Comes with none of that crap, but does come with uBlock Origin.