3 ms·
"Surprisingly, ELIZA, developed in the mid-1960s by computer scientist Joseph Weizenbaum at MIT, scored relatively well during the study, achieving a success ra
by 7thaccount 3y ago
"Surprisingly, ELIZA, developed in the mid-1960s by computer scientist Joseph Weizenbaum at MIT, scored relatively well during the study, achieving a success rate of 27 percent. GPT-3.5, depending on the prompt, scored a 14 percent success rate, below ELIZA. GPT-4 achieved a success rate of 41 percent, second only to actual humans"
GPT-4 did better. I think the article stated 3.5 was like that by design.
- FrustratedMonky 3y agoYep missed this " And like GPT-3.5, GPT-4 has also been conditioned not to present itself as human"