4 ms·

> Dear GPT Builder, > It’s been less than a month since we announced GPTs and we are blown away by the useful and fun GPTs that you and the builder community h

> Dear GPT Builder, > It’s been less than a month since we announced GPTs and we are blown away by the useful and fun GPTs that you and the builder community have created. > We are continuing to make improvements to GPTs based on your feedback. To improve Actions we updated the configuration interface, enabled one click testing, added debug messages in preview, and now allow multiple domains. There have also been questions around uploaded files. Uploaded files are downloadable when using Code Interpreter so we’ve made this feature default off and added messaging to better explain this. If you have additional feedback, we’d love to hear from you here. > In terms of what’s next, we are now planning to launch the GPT Store early next year. While we had expected to release it this month, a few unexpected things have been keeping us busy! In the meantime, we will have some other great updates to ChatGPT soon. Thank you for investing time to build a GPT. > - ChatGPT Team

devindotcom 3y ago
appreciated, but do you mind forwarding the email itself? it's not that I don't trust you, just helpful to have. I won't use your email for anything. edit: thanks to all who sent.
- nwiswell 3y ago
  I don't mean to be harsh, but is this journalism now? When you write an article and say something has been corroborated by your "sources", does that mean "forwarded to you by anonymous HN posters"? You don't have an IRL relationship with a source who has created a GPT? You can't throw a stone in the valley without hitting somebody who has.
  - sen 3y ago
    That has always been journalism. “Sources” encompasses all sources from whistleblowers to employee leaks to random overheard conversations on the internet or AFK.
    - deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
  - drusepth 3y ago
    I think the crux of the request was that they didn't get the email that "each and every creator of a GPT" was apparently supposed to get. I've created almost a dozen GPTs that I and some others use almost every day, and I didn't get the email either. I think it's reasonable to ask for someone (even a stranger) to forward you a missing email. Edit: Asked a friend and he didn't get any email either. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
mark_l_watson 3y ago
Thanks, I received the same email.

devindotcom 3y ago

appreciated, but do you mind forwarding the email itself? it's not that I don't trust you, just helpful to have. I won't use your email for anything. edit: thanks to all who sent.

nwiswell 3y ago
I don't mean to be harsh, but is this journalism now? When you write an article and say something has been corroborated by your "sources", does that mean "forwarded to you by anonymous HN posters"? You don't have an IRL relationship with a source who has created a GPT? You can't throw a stone in the valley without hitting somebody who has.
- sen 3y ago
  That has always been journalism. “Sources” encompasses all sources from whistleblowers to employee leaks to random overheard conversations on the internet or AFK.
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
- drusepth 3y ago
  I think the crux of the request was that they didn't get the email that "each and every creator of a GPT" was apparently supposed to get. I've created almost a dozen GPTs that I and some others use almost every day, and I didn't get the email either. I think it's reasonable to ask for someone (even a stranger) to forward you a missing email. Edit: Asked a friend and he didn't get any email either. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

mark_l_watson 3y ago

Thanks, I received the same email.