> That is 90% of the work with RAG. RAG requires a surprising amount of QA to ensure "the best" is sufficient for your use case. Thanks that's insightful (and

> That is 90% of the work with RAG. RAG requires a surprising amount of QA to ensure "the best" is sufficient for your use case. Thanks that's insightful (and also adds to my current impostor syndrome), and makes a lot of sense... so it sounds like it's easy to write the query, but knowing the metric value to use is the testing part. I haven't heard of HNSW but I'll give it a try. It seems PGVector has added HNSW: https://github.com/pgvector/pgvector#hnsw https://github.com/pgvector/pgvector#hnsw