3 ms·
Ok, agreed. Now, if you're telling me there is in office abuse, why would I assume it's not worse when no one is looking? It's not even an assumption. We KNOW
by SV_BubbleTime 3y ago
Ok, agreed.
Now, if you're telling me there is in office abuse, why would I assume it's not worse when no one is looking?
It's not even an assumption. We KNOW people are working two jobs, or they take off when they feel like it, there are plenty of annecdotes of people saying "I only work 20 hours a week now, and get the same amount done".
Look, I don't care. My employees are remote or have the option, but we have daily standups and its a small team. It works as a small team and falls apart at scale.
The fact that WFH advocates get emotional, nonsensical, and flat out refuse to discuss or admit abuse is all I need to know that it is more rampant that people are admitting to.
- surgical_fire 3y ago> The fact that WFH advocates get emotional, nonsensical Interestingly, the person you are responding to is very reasonable in their point. You, on the other hand, sound pretty emotional and nonsensical about "WFH abuse". If you can't measure productivity of your remote team, that is really a "you" problem.