> Should the OP have written a manuscript to make you feel better? Nope > only be refuted by something of similar length? No, but if you don't address the po

> Should the OP have written a manuscript to make you feel better? Nope > only be refuted by something of similar length? No, but if you don't address the points that have been made, you're not refuting. The comment says "refactor your codebase to put the related code together", but the article already addresses some downsides to this approach. Does the commenter believe that those downsides are more avoidable than the article states? Or maybe they believe the downsides are dwarfed by the upsides? Or maybe something else. We don't know, so we can't evaluate the position effectively.