3 ms·
I'd argue it's worth it. Some practical ideas, when allocating the money for research 30% or so has to be kept back for replication. Public science is mostly g
by Voultapher 3y ago
I'd argue it's worth it.
Some practical ideas, when allocating the money for research 30% or so has to be kept back for replication. Public science is mostly government funded. And the government could allocate X% percent of the budget for replication work. It sounds like a solvable problem to me.
- ffgjgf1 3y agoI agree in principle but forcing institutions or governments to allocate money for this and enforce is pretty much an unsolvable problem at this point IMO.
- Voultapher 3y agoYeah, as I said it's also a question of culture and that's very difficult to change.