"using the same naming convention on server as client means our JS doesn't have a mix of camelCase and under_scores for things received via JSON" Couldn't that

"using the same naming convention on server as client means our JS doesn't have a mix of camelCase and under_scores for things received via JSON" Couldn't that almost be viewed as a feature, rather than a bug? I mean, this way you can instantly tell if a particular variable was received from the server via JSON or was defined in the client code itself. I would consider a naming distinction like to be a benefit, rather than a harm.