3 ms·
If worse leaders can be effective in office and not remote, isn't that a pro-office argument?
by jayd16 3y ago
If worse leaders can be effective in office and not remote, isn't that a pro-office argument?
- happytiger 3y agoOn identical logic: that on-prem companies don’t hire the best leaders because they aren’t needed.
- bluGill 3y agoThere are a lot more okay leaders than great leaders. And it is hard to developer new leaders.
- jayd16 3y agoFor that to follow, you'd have to assume that its irrelevant anyway because the best and not the best provide equal value. Conversely, if the best provides more value no matter the situation then companies are incentivized to hire the best and RTO.
- hot_gril 3y agoI'm confused by this too. What good is an in-office leader if everyone else is remote?
- jayd16 3y agoThe conversation is about remote or co-located leadership. If the lead is in-office and the team is not, it would be remote leadership in this context. The whole team needs to be in office to change that.